Chileno. Licenciado y profesor de Filosofía por la Universidad de Playa Ancha. Actualmente cursa el Magister en Filosofía en la Universidad Alberto Hurtado con beca ANID-PFCHA / Magíster Nacional / 2019 – 22190549.
The distinction between perception and fantasy is not a cliché among others. Tracing the path to its correct elaboration even allows us to think this distinction as the engine of the early Husserlian phenomenology. For this reason, this brief article aims to contrast Brentano and Husserl's vision of this subject. For the former, fantasy is an improper representation [Vorstellung] with an intuitive nucleus; for the latter, it has a properly intuitive character. In this transit, it will be shown that this opposite view is mainly due to Husserl's general critique of Brentano's idea, according to which intentionality has essentially two objects and this critique is in turn rooted in Husserl's well-known theory of Auffassung. Thus, we will finally show that the dispute of both authors regarding fantasy and perception must be understood as one of the consequences of the theory of apprehension, elaborated by Husserl in the VI Logical Investigation.
References
BRENTANO, Franz. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Routledge, London and New York, 1995.
BRENTANO, Franz. Descriptive psychology. Routledge, London and New York, 1982.
BRENTANO, Franz. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Dritte Band, Vom sinnlichen und noetischen Bewusstsein, Äussere und innere Wahrnehmung, Bregrif-fe. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg, 1968.
CHÁVEZ, Román. «La imagen y sus conflictos: conciencia de imagen y representación en Husserl». Ricardo Gibu y Ángel Xolocotzi (editores). Imagen y sentido. Reflexiones fenomenológicas y hermenéuticas. Nautilum, México, 2016. pp. 70-80.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Investigaciones lógicas. Editorial Alianza, España, 2006.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit: Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893-1912), Springer, Dordrecht, 2004.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Philosophy of arithmetic. Psychological and logical investigations. Springer, Los Angeles, 2003.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Aufsätze und Vorträge: (1911-1921), ed. Sepp Hans Rainer, Nenon Thomas, Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1987.
HUSSERL, Edmund. Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung: Zur Phänomenologie der nschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen, Nijhoff, Den Haag, 1980.
MARBACH, Eduard. «Sobre a elaboração progressiva dos pensamentos de Husserl acerca da fantasia e da consciência de imagem através da escrita». En Phainomenon, N° 29, 2019. pp. 9-37.
MASSIN, Olivier. «Brentano on sensation and sensory qualities». Uriah Kriegel (editor). The routledge handbook of FranzBrentano and the Brentano school. Routledge, New York, 2017. pp. 87-96.
ROLLINGER, Robin. «Brentano’s psychology from an empirical standpoint: it’s back-ground and conception». Ion Tanasescu (editor). Franz Brentano’s methaphysics and psychology. Zeta Books, Bucharest, 2012. pp. 261-209
ROLLINGER, Robin. Husserl’s position in the school of Brentano. Springer, Freiburg, 1999.
ROLLINGER, Robin. «Husserl and Brentano on imagination». En Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, N° 75, Walter de Gruyter, 1993. pp. 195-210.
TANASESCU, Ion. «The intentionality of sensation and the problem of classification of philosophical scienses in Brentano’s empirical psychology». En Axiomathes, N° 27, 2017. pp. 243-263.
TANASESCU, Ion. «Le concept psychologique de la représentation de la fantaisie chez Brentano et sa réception chez Husserl». En Studia Phaenomenologica, N° 10, 2010. pp. 45-75
XOLOCOTZI, Ángel. «El impacto del problema de la representación (Vorstellung) en el inicio de la fenomenología husserliana». En One insight, N° 18, enero-abril 2019. pp. 159-184.
RIZZO PATRÓN, Rosemary. «Génesis de las investigaciones lógicas de Husserl: una obra de irrupción». En Signos Filosóficos, N° 7, México, 2022. pp. 221-244.
