Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito
logo de la revista

Artículos

V. 17 N. 1 (2026)

El innatismo moderado y el concepto de naturaleza humana

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20451536
Inviata
novembre 11, 2025
Pubblicato
2026-06-01

Abstract

El objetivo general del artículo consiste en examinar el concepto de naturaleza humana desde la perspectiva del innatismo moderado, contrastándolo con el innatismo radical y las posturas culturalistas. Frente a los enfoques radicales, que postulan rasgos conductuales universales y genéticamente determinados, el innatismo moderado propone la existencia de mecanismos psicológicos innatos, de influencia indirecta y potencial. Estos mecanismos psicológicos pueden ser modulados, regulados o incluso inhibidos por procesos de orden superior (condicionamiento y deliberación). El resultado es una concepción deflacionaria, pluralista y de esencialismo causal de la naturaleza humana, que explica la diversidad conductual sin renunciar a ciertas predisposiciones evolucionadas. Este marco evita el determinismo genético y se alinea con evidencias contemporáneas de la neurociencia y la evolución, ofreciendo una vía intermedia promisoria en el debate naturaleza versus cultura.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. Adolphs, R., & Anderson, D. J. (2018). The neuroscience of emotion: A new synthesis. Princeton University Press.
  2. Ardrey, R. (1966). The Territorial Imperative: A Personal Inquiry Into the Animal Origins of Property and Nations. Atheneum.
  3. Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. Springer.
  4. Boyd, R. (1989). What realism implies and what it does not. Dialectica, 43(1-2), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00928.x
  5. Buller, D. J. (2005). Adapting Minds. Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. MIT Press.
  6. Buller, D. J. (2009). Four Fallacies of Pop Evolutionary Psychology. Scientific American, 300(1), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0109-74
  7. Buss, D. M. (2020). Evolutionary psychology is a scientific revolution. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000210
  8. Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace.
  9. Damasio, A. R. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon Books.
  10. Damasio, A. R. (2019). The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of the cultures. Vintage Books.
  11. Damasio, A. R. (2021). Feeling & knowing: Making minds conscious. Pantheon Books.
  12. Darwin, C. (1981). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton University Press.
  13. Dennett, D. C. (2003). The mythical threat of genetic determinism. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(12), B7-B9.
  14. Diogo, R. (2022). Meaning of Life, Human Nature, and Delusions: How Tales about Love, Sex, Races, Gods and Progress Affect Our Lives and Earth’s Splendor. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70401-2
  15. Dupré, J. (2003). On human nature. Human Affairs, 13(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2003-130203
  16. Ereshefsky, M. (2010). What’s Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 674-685. https://doi.org/10.1086/656545
  17. Ghiselin, M. T. (1997). Metaphysics and the origin of species. State University of New York Press.
  18. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral Foundations Theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. En Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55-130). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
  19. Gray, R. D., Heaney, M., & Fairhall, S. (2003). Evolutionary psychology and the challenge of adaptive expansion. En K. Sterelny & J. Fitness (Eds.), From mating to mentality: Evaluating evolutionary psychology (pp. 247-268). Psychology Press.
  20. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage Books.
  21. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social Intuitionists answer six questions about Moral Psychology. En W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 181-218). MIT Press.
  22. Holmström, N. (2024). From a Marxist Feminist Point of View: Essays on Freedom, Rationality and Human Nature. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004703292
  23. Horodecka, A. (2022). Human nature in modern economics: Structure, change and perspectives. Routledge.
  24. Hull, D. L. (1986). On Human Nature. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1986, 3-13.
  25. Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic Emotions, Natural Kinds, Emotion Schemas, and a New Paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 260-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00044.x
  26. Kronfeldner, M. E. (2018). What’s left of human nature? A post-essentialist, pluralist, and interactive account of a contested concept. MIT Press.
  27. LeDoux, J. E. (2012). Rethinking the Emotional Brain. Neuron, 73(4), 653-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.004
  28. LeDoux, J. E. (2019). The Deep History of Ourselves: The Four-Billion-Year Story of How We Got Conscious Brains. Viking.
  29. Lewis, M. (2008). The Emergence of Human Emotions. En M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (3.a ed., pp. 304-319). The Guilford Press.
  30. Lloyd, E. A. (1999). Evolutionary Psychology: The Burdens of Proof. Biology and Philosophy, 14(2), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006638501739
  31. Machery, E. (2008). A Plea for Human Nature. Philosophical Psychology, 21(3), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802170119
  32. Mameli, M. (2024). Why Human Nature Matters: Between Biology and Politics. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350189782
  33. Marcos, A. (2017). Antropotecnias y naturaleza humana. En J. Sanmartín Esplugues & R. Gutiérrez Lombardo (Eds.), Técnica y ser humano (pp. 101-130). Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano.
  34. Mayr, E. (1959). Darwin and the evolutionary theory in biology. En B. J. Meggers (Ed.), Evolution and anthropology: A centennial appraisal (pp. 1-10). Anthropological Society of Washington.
  35. McKinnon, S. (2005). Neo-liberal genetics: The myths and moral tales of evolutionary psychology. Prickly Paradigm Press.
  36. Mosterín, J. (2011). La Naturaleza humana. Espasa.
  37. Nathan, M. J. (2024). The quest for human nature: What philosophy and science have learned. Oxford University press.
  38. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.
  39. Panksepp, J. (2011). The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: Do animals have affective lives? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(9), 1791-1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.003
  40. Panksepp, J. (2012). A Synopsis of Affective Neuroscience—Naturalizing the Mammalian Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(3-4), 6-18.
  41. Panksepp, J., & Panksepp, J. B. (2000). The seven sins of evolutionary psychology. Evolution and cognition, 6(2), 108-131.
  42. Pantelis, E. (2019). Human subjective homologues of established basic emotion correlations in lower mammals: A neuro-psychoanalytic study [Tesis Doctoral]. University of Cape Town.
  43. Peters, B. M. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: Neglecting neurobiology in defining the mind. Theory & Psychology, 23(3), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313480269
  44. Petruccelli, A. (2010). Materialismo histórico: Interpretaciones y controversias. Prometeo Libros.
  45. Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Penguin.
  46. Pinker, S. (2003). La tabla rasa: La negación moderna de la naturaleza humana. Paidós.
  47. Ramsey, G. (2023). Human Nature. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108685481
  48. Rellihan, M. (2012). Adaptationism and adaptive thinking in evolutionary psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 25(2), 245-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.579416
  49. Richardson, R. C. (2007). Evolutionary psychology as maladapted psychology. MIT Press.
  50. Rose, H. (Ed.). (2000). Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. Vintage.
  51. Samuels, R. (2012). Science and Human Nature. En C. Sandis & M. J. Cain (Eds.), Human nature (pp. 1-28). Cambridge University Press.
  52. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2023). The Importance of Evolution to Understandings of Human Nature. En The Importance of Evolution to Understandings of Human Nature. Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/64177
  53. Smith, S. E. (2020). Is Evolutionary Psychology Possible? Biological Theory, 15(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00336-4
  54. Sober, E. (1980). Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism. Philosophy of Science, 47(3), 350-383.
  55. Somit, A., & Peterson, S. A. (Eds.). (2003). Human nature and public policy: An evolutionary approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
  56. Tattersall, I. (2001). Evolution, Genes, and Behavior. Zygon, 36(4), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00389
  57. Wehner, P., & Brooks, A. C. (2011). Wealth & Justice: The Morality of Democratic Capitalism. AEI Press.
  58. Wilson, J. Q. (1997). The moral sense. Free Press.
  59. Wright, R. (1994a). The Moral Animal: The New Science of Evolutionary Psychology. Pantheon Books.
  60. Wright, R. (1994b, noviembre 28). Feminists, meet Mr. Darwin. New Republic, 34-41.
  61. Yanushevsky, R. (2021). Sociology, Politics, and Human Nature. Peter Lang.