Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy
The theme of this research article is focused on the question about the importance of the dionysianisms in the Nietzsche’s Philosophy in The Born of Tragedy. The central question of the existence in the Greece’s chorus the Dionysus’ presence, the role of Dionysus in the last Euripides’s theatric works and the relation of this author with the Socrates’ intellectualism. These are some of the fundamental elements which will be studied in this article. For getting it, we suggested a theatric ride around these different protagonists of this story, which is the same History of Occident. So, through these pages will pass: Euripides, Socrates, Silenus, Midas’s King and include an atypical Cynic Diogenes, oddly enough closer to the Nietzsche later to The Born of Tragedy
