Argentino. Licenciado y Profesor de Enseñanza Media y Superior en Ciencia Política por la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Doctorando en Filosofía por Universidad Nacional de Lanús, y Becario doctoral de laComisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ha publicado diversos artículos y capítulos de libro sobre el problema del tránsito entre las sociedades disciplinarias y las sociedades de control desde las lecturas de Foucault, Deleuze y el “autonomismo italiano”. Actualmente realiza una investigación acerca del neoliberalismo como tecnología de poder y modalidad de subjetivación. Su proyecto de tesis doctoral se titula: Foucault. Un pensamiento situado en el umbral de las sociedades disciplinarias
As Michel Foucault argues, the speeches of modern and contemporary philosophy tend to be divided between two important currents criticism: the first develops an “analytical of the truth”, while the other performs an “ontology of the present”. The latter explores the current field of the contemporary and possible experiences, in simpler terms, it asks for the “we”, or how we have become what we are today. Thus, the following article will hold that the questions about our present lead to moments of emergency of neoliberalism. In the first place, because there is defined an adverse experience on the modes of life of modern capi-talist societies; secondly, because the same experiences point to the need to reform the salaried workers; and finally, because the reforms in question foment the adoption of others ways of life and economic existence. That is why the ontology proposal is also a criticism against neoliberalism; or rather, against the way in which neoliberalism constitutes us as subjects